Skip to main content

Table 2 NMs’ physico-chemical properties in the stock preparation

From: Hazard assessment of nanomaterials: how to meet the requirements for (next generation) risk assessment

Nanomaterial

Size by TEM (nm)

Morphology (aspect ratio; variable used in similarity analyses)

HDD

ζ-Potential

By Intensity (nm)*

By Number (nm)*

PDI*

Mean (mV)

Conductivity (mS/cm)

Dilution factor

pH

CeO2 NPs

4.1 ± 0.6

Spheric (1:1; 1)

5.48 ± 0.6

3.7 ± 0.3

0.250

− 34.7 ± 2.7

0.59

1:25

8.64

CeO2 aggregates

6.2 ± 1.3

Spheric (1:1; 1)

180.3 ± 7.0

44.8 ± 5.4

0.405

− 17.9 ± 1.0

0.03

1:40

7.95

CeO2 stamps

15.3 ± 2.1

Flat (3.75:3.75:1; 2.8)

102.4 ± 5.0

33.3 ± 0.6

0.129

− 25.0 ± 0.6

0.12

1:10

8.24

TiO2 NPs

9.4 ± 2.8

Spheric with anisotropy (1.25:1; 1.25)

69.7 ± 7.3

33.2 ± 4.0

0.362

− 48.3 ± 0.6

0.092

1:200

6.52

TiO2 aggregates

9.4 ± 2.8

Spheric with anisotropy (1.25:1; 1.25)

197.9 ± 6.1

53.7 ± 25.7

0.357

− 42.5 ± 0.1

0.020

1:200

6.52

TiO2 nanorods

L 142 ± 29

Rod (3.7:1; 3.7)

143.4 ± 2.8

87.4 ± 6.1

0.118

− 45.8 ± 1.0

0.086

1:200

10.0

W 38.2 ± 7.9

Ag 20 nm NPs

23.9 ± 4.4

Spheric (1:1; 1)

50.7 ± 4.0

15.0 ± 5.7

0.282

− 28.2 ± 6.7

0.04

1:125

6.71

Ag 50 nm NPs

52.9 ± 4.8

Spheric (1:1; 1)

63.4 ± 1.0

38.0 ± 2.8

0.236

− 43.3 ± 5.4

0.05

1:50

6.60

Ag nanowires

L 5–10 μm

W 106 ± 14

Wire (100:1 – 50:1; 75)

1st 423 ± 177

 

0.226

− 10.4 ± 0.7

0.01

1:50

6.8

2nd 5170 ± 490

 
  1. *Mean of 3 independent experiments ± SD
  2. More details on NMs characterization, both for the morphology of the NMs cores and for the colloidal characterization can be found in Supplementary material 1